You are in our Global Site

Change location

Our website does not support this browser  

The Clinical Benefits of Nestlé’s Human Milk Oligosaccharide Blend

Advancing the management of cow’s milk protein allergy​

Cow’s milk protein allergy (CMPA) is an immune-mediated disease characterised by allergic reactions to cow’s milk protein. CMPA is also associated with increased gut permeability and an altered gut microbiota which affect the maturation of the immune system. Human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) are proven to positively modulate the gut microbiota and reduce the risk of infections.​

Infants with CMPA are at a higher risk of infections and future allergies

The first 1,000 days of life are a window of opportunity to set solid foundations for infants’ future health. This period is a time of rapid physiological change and plasticity with significant potential for lasting effects.1 It is also a period of heightened vulnerability.2 Infants are born with a functionally immature intestine3 and a developing gut microbiota4 and immune system.5 The maturation of these three systems is complex and closely linked.6

Clinical benefits figure 1

CMPA is a reproducible immune-mediated allergic response to otherwise harmless cow’s milk protein11 and is one of the most common food allergies in infants, affecting up to 3%.11 Clinical manifestations are variable in type and severity, and may involve the skin, the gastrointestinal (GI) and respiratory tracts.12

Infants with CMPA also have an increased gut permeability13 and altered gut microbiota composition (dysbiosis),8,9 which can affect immune system maturation (Fig.1) and can result in long term health consequences.10 Food allergy is associated with an increased risk of infections:14-16

  • Recurrent ear infections during childhood:14,15 2x
  • Respiratory tract infections in the first two years of life:16 3.9x

Children diagnosed with CMPA in infancy are at a higher risk of respiratory atopy and atopic dermatitis by 10 years of age:15

  • Asthma: 6.7x
  • Atopic eczema: 3.6x
  • Allergic rhinitis: 3x

Breastfeeding is best

Breastfeeding is the gold standard for infant nutrition and should always be supported.12 In the case of CMPA, it may require excluding cow’s milk protein from the mothers’ diet.12

If breastfeeding is not possible for any reason, then hypoallergenic specialty formulas with proven clinical efficacy are recommended. Extensively hydrolysed formulas are supported as first-line management for the majority of infants with CMPA (~90%), while amino acid-based formulas are reserved for those with severe symptoms (~10%).12 However, while an elimination diet with hypoallergenic specialty formulas relieves symptoms, dietary avoidance alone does not support the immune system.

HMO support the immune system

Breast milk contains large quantities of HMO, non-nutritive components known to support infants’ developing immune systems.17 They represent the third most abundant solid component after lactose and lipids. Out of approximately 200 HMO, 2’-fucosyllactose (2’FL) and lacto-N-neotetraose (LNnT) are two of the most significant, typically accounting for more than 30%.18,19 The unique structures of HMO are essential for their four immune related benefits:20

  1. Bacteria

    HMO shape early-life intestinal microbiota, selectively supporting the growth of beneficial bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium.21

  2. Pathogen

    HMO prevent pathogen growth and adhesion by acting as decoy receptors. For example, 2’FL has been shown to bind to Campylobacter jejuni (a common cause of diarrhoea in infants) leading to its intestinal clearance.22

  3. Gut wall

    HMO help to strengthen the gut barrier by inducing differentiation and influencing intestinal cell gene expression and surface glycosylation.23

  4. Immune maturation

    HMO directly and indirectly modulate mucosal and systemic immune function, ultimately guiding the immune system maturation.17

Clinical benefits of 2’FL and LNnT

For more than 50 years, HMO, and more specifically 2’FL and LNnT, have been an exciting area of research at Nestlé. This has led to 5 clinical trials with formula supplemented with structurally identical 2’FL and LNnT (not sourced from human milk), in both healthy infants24,25 and infants with CMPA.26-28

Assessment of hypoallergenicity and safety

The IVORY study demonstrated that Althéra® HMO, a whey-based extensively hydrolysed formula supplemented with 2’FL and LNnT, is both safe and well tolerated in infants with CMPA. It met the widely adopted American Academy of Pediatrics hypoallergenicity criteria, ensuring with 95% confidence that 90% of infants with documented CMPA will not react to the formula under double-blind, placebo-controlled conditions.26

The PLATYPUS study further demonstrated that Alfamino® HMO, an amino acid-based formula supplemented with the same blend of 2’FL and LNnT, is well tolerated and safe in infants with moderate-severe CMPA.27

Effective symptom relief & normal growth

The CINNAMON study confirmed that Althéra® HMO effectively relieves symptoms of CMPA.29 The CINNAMON and PLATYPUS studies also showed that Althéra® HMO and Alfamino® HMO, respectively, promote normal growth in line with WHO growth standards.27,29

Reducing the risk of infections

In the CINNAMON trial, infants fed Althéra® HMO had 42% significantly fewer upper respiratory tract infection episodes (Fig. 2A). A trend towards a relative risk reduction of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) by 34% and GI infections by 40% was also observed, as well as a 71% relative risk reduction of otitis media.28 In the per protocol analysis, the relative risk of otitis media was significantly reduced by 100% (p<0.05).

Whilst the relative risk reduction for all infections was not statistically significant, these results are in line with the 44% and 63% significant relative risk reduction for LRTI and bronchitis, respectively, that was observed in healthy infants fed a standard infant formula supplemented with the same quantity of 2’FL and LNnT, who were followed from birth and over a longer time period (Fig. 2A & 2B).24,28,29 The clinical trial in healthy infants also demonstrated a significant relative risk reduction in

A. Infants with CMPA (mean age at enrolment: 3.2 months; mean trial duration: 8.8 months)

Percentage of infants with
≤1 episode

LRTI stats

Mean incidence rate

URTI stats

Percentage of infants with
≤1 episode

Otitis media stats
Otitis media

Percentage of infants with
≤1 episode

GI infections stats
GI infections

B. Healthy infants (enrolment before 14 days of age; mean trial duration 12 months)

Percentage of infants with
≤1 episode

LRTI stats

Percentage of infants with
≤1 episode

Bronchitis stats

Percentage of infants with
≤1 episode

Otitis media stats
Otitis media

Percentage of infants with
≤1 episode

Antibiotic use stats
Antibiotic use

Figure 2: Reduction in parent-reported adverse events and medication use in randomized, double-blind, controlled trials.

A. Results in infants with CMPA (CINNAMON study), comparing Althéra® HMO with 2’FL and LNnT (pink) to a control formula (Althéra®) without 2’FL and LNnT (grey). B. Results in healthy infants, comparing a standard infant formula with 2’FL and LNnT (blue) to a control standard infant formula without 2’FL and LNnT (grey). LRTI: lower respiratory tract infection; URTI: upper respiratory tract infection; N.S.: not significant; RRR: relative risk reduction.

Positive effect on the gut microbiota

In the CINNAMON study, Althéra® HMO positively modulated the gut microbiota of infants with CMPA closer to the profile of healthy breastfed infants.35

This supports similar findings from a previous study in healthy infants fed a standard infant formula supplemented with 2’FL and LNnT. Here, 2’FL and LNnT positively modulated the gut microbiota closer to that of healthy breastfed infants, notably with higher counts of Bifidobacteria. This improved microbiota was associated with a reduction in antibiotics during the first year of life.30


Decades of research have helped to better understand the unique immune-nurturing properties of HMO.

Althéra® HMO, Alfaré® HMO and Alfamino® HMO are for fast and effective relief from the symptoms of CMPA.12,26,29,31-34 The addition of 2’FL and LNnT has been additionally shown to reduce the risk of infections.24,28,29 Clinical trial data from healthy infants also suggest supplementing hypoallergenic speciality formulas with 2’FL and LNnT could help to address gut microbiota dysbiosis seen in infants with CMPA.30,35

Further data are expected in 2021 and 2022 from the CINNAMON and PLATYPUS studies.


Mothers should be encouraged to continue breastfeeding even when their infants have cow’s milk protein allergy. This usually requires qualified dietary counseling to completely exclude all sources of cow’s milk protein from the mothers’ diet. If a decision to use a special formula intended for infants is taken, it is important to give instructions on correct preparation methods, emphasizing that unboiled water, unsterilized bottles or incorrect dilution can all lead to illness. Formula for special medical purposes intended for infants must be used under medical supervision.


  1. The biology of the first 1,000 days. Taylor & Francis eBooks, 2018
  2. Agosti M, et al. Pediatr Med Chir 2017;39(2):157
  3. Chin AM, et al. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2017;66:81-93
  4. Robertson RC, et al. Trends Microbiol 2019;27(2):131-47
  5. Holt PG, Jones CA. Allergy 2000;55:688-97
  6. Dzidic M, et al. Med Sci 2018;6(3):56
  7. Crittenden RG, Bennett LE. J Am Coll Nutr 2005;24(6suppl):582-91
  8. Azad MB, et al. Clin Exp Allergy 2015;45(3):632-43
  9. Thompson-Chagoyan OC, et al. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2011;156(3):325–32
  10. Tanaka M, Nakayama J. Allergol Int 2017;66(4):515-22
  11. Flom JD, Sicherer SF. Nutrients 2019;11:1051
  12. Koletzko S, et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012;55(2):221-9
  13. Jalonen T. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991;88(5):737-42
  14. Juntti H, et al. Acta Otolaryngol 1999;119(8):867-73
  15. Tikkanen S, et al. Acta Paediatr 2000; 89(10):1174-80
  16. Woicka-Kolejwa K, et al. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 2016;33(2):109-13
  17. Donovan SM, Comstock SS. Ann Nutr Metab 2016;69(suppl2):42-51
  18. Yu ZT, et al. Glycobiology 2013;23(11):1281-92
  19. Newburg DS, et al. Glycobiology 2004;14(3):253-63
  20. Bode L and Jantscher-Krenn E. Adv Nutr. 2012;3(3):383S–391S
  21. Garrido D, et al. Microbiology 2013;159(Pt 4):649-64
  22. Ruiz-Palacious GM, et al. J Biol Chem 2003;278(16):14112-20
  23. Bode L. Glycobiology 2012;22(9):1147–62
  24. Puccio G, et al. J. Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2017;64(4):624-31
  25. Riechmann ER, Presentation at SEGHNP Congress, Santander, May 2019
  26. Nowak-Wegrzyn A, et al. Nutrients 2019;11(7):E1447
  27. Nestlé Health Science, data on file. PLATYPUS study
  28. Vandenplas Y, et al. Presentation at EAACI Digital Congress, June 2020
  29. Vandenplas Y, et al. Presentation at PAAM Congress, Florence, Italy, October 2019
  30. Berger B, et al. mBio 2020;11(2):e03196-19
  31. Nowak-Wegrzyn A, et al. Allergy 2019;74(8):1582-4
  32. Niggemann B, et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2008;19(4):348-54
  33. Vandenplas Y, et al. Acta Paediatr 2013;102(10):990-8
  34. Nowak-Wegrzyn A, et al. Clin Pediatr 2015;54:264–72
  35. Pedersen H, et al. Congress Poster: the FAAM-EUROBAT Digital 2020 meeting